.......... but for some reason he never follows through. Bluff anyone?
From <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134904247600>
David Linhardt (e360):
If you are interested in pursuing any, or all, of the "flamers" on this
so-called news group that think they re hiding behind fake
identitities, call me.
The US Court system has been addressing the issue of internet "fake"
identities and new case law, within the last six months, now allows for
Plaintiffs, like yourself, to legally "serve" those hiding behind fake
email addresses right at that "fake" address - and the Defendant has
the usual twenty days ONLY to reply.
Knowing this, last July I got on this list and "baited" the whole group
asking for the identities of the Spamhaus "volunteers" for my lawsuit.
These fools know nothing about the law, and make up things that sound
good to them, I think. What I got out of my "baiting," with over a
thousand replies, was seventy-three names of Defendants - and I
couldn't care less if they identify themselves when I ask them - for
I'll just file against their fake name, wait the twenty days, then file
for a default judgment.
Once I have the judgment in hand, THEN I can really go after them.
And, since I'll be using a "violation of a criminal Statute" as the
basis, I'll be able to call upon law enforcement to find them for me.
Once I have that judgment I'll be able to go after their employers -
for a good many of them are sitting in front of their employer's
computer, on their employers time, doing what they do. And, there are
the "deep pockets" Defendants to pay for my litigation costs.
Amused in California.
Tim Bolen
